Re: libc5 uploads for bo
In article <Pine.LNX.3.96.971117191932.7744C-100000@monet>,
Christian Schwarz <schwarz@monet.m.isar.de> wrote:
>You're right! I'll try to fix the rules:
>
> 1. The "bo" and "hamm" versions should get different version
> numbers (e.g. for bug reports)
>
> 2. The "bo" version has to be always less than the "hamm" version
>
> 3. Of course, the list of "bo" and the list of "hamm" versions have to
> be in increasing order.
>
>I think we have to use epochs then:
>
> bo-unstable unstable
> old package 1.2-4.bo 1:1.2-4
> new package 1.2-5.bo 1:1.2-5
>
>Comments?
Epochs? Yuk! This means that each package for which a libc5 upload is done
is forever stuck with an epoch? Hmm... I'll pass.
Mike.
--
Miquel van | Cistron Internet Services -- Alphen aan den Rijn.
Smoorenburg, | mailto:info@cistron.nl http://www.cistron.nl/
miquels@cistron.nl | PTT's Het Net: Surfen in de gootsteen! <*>
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: