Re: Libc6 progress
David Welton wrote:
>Redoing indent for libc6, will do a non maintainer upload today. I
>compiled find, so if there are other considerations, please let me know.
Excellent :)
I can't parse "I compiled find", though. Perhaps a typo for "It
compiled fine"? In that case, yes, often the packages only need
recompiling. But this is also a good opportunity to check the
Standards-Version field, and bring it up to date with 2.3.0.0 (or
2.3.0.1). If the package is in the old source format this probably
means repackaging it completely.
>Will we be seeing this list more or less every week? I find it useful in
>that it provides a nice list of packages from which I can pick and choose
>to do some non-maintainer uploads:-)
I didn't plan to, because it's a bit long, but I can do it very easily
if there's interest. I'm going to keep it up to date anyway, for my own
reading pleasure :-)
joost witteveen already pointed out an error in the list: xaw3d should
not be listed, because it is the libc5 version of xaw3dg. The same
probably goes for xaw95, but I can't find the libc6 version of that.
Richard Braakman
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: