Re: Why does sendmail depend on procmail?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 6 Oct 1997, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> We should have both, and let sendmail depend on a virtual
> package, and people may make their own choices.
This would be the best solution, but deliver and procmail have different
command-line options. sendmail.cf reads:
A=deliver -r $g $u
for deliver, and
A=procmail -Y -a $h -d $u
for procmail.
Should deliver/procmail postinst change sendmail configuration
automatically? Should deliver/procmail postinst force a sendmail
reconfigure? If we do this, why not for the other MTAs?
Maybe we need a new (real, not virtual) package "mda-base" to manage
all this? [ I had some ideas about this, see bug #11655 ].
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: latin1
iQCVAgUBNDoSeCqK7IlOjMLFAQFu6gP/d8+LE0PMEp/SKnFyeW2j00OXdC+cr4AH
TknYIUG73zRbKU1kSNyIkg2pKev8Gk+0zXFgMOvKjOQq1dJRuhkN82NyROczgdp+
St4Vz4BhJo93oQjML9wDWbYCmVDCa3TIWEuLmVs8zt3qCu8p5q5SnhhFM9rElly9
+i7eyf28mJE=
=rJQW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: