[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: berolist



On Sat, Jul 12, 1997 at 02:51:00PM +0200, Kai Henningsen wrote:
> moffatt@yallara.cs.rmit.edu.au (Hamish Moffatt)  wrote on 10.07.97 in <[🔎] 19970710132449.61571@yallara.cs.rmit.edu.au>:
> 
> > > > -------------------------| BeroList-2.3.5 ready...
> > > >
> > > > Sending to list...
> > > > Connected to localhost.
> > > > < 220-Connecting to IDENTD server.
> > > > > HELO yodeller.rising.com.au
> > > > < 220-Connected, sending request to server.
> > > > Server doesn't accept HELO.
> > > >|------------------------- Failed addresses follow:
> 
> Hmm. This sure looks like someone doesn't understand SMTP continuation  
> lines here. The error message above looks like a bug in the SMTP client to  
> me. '220-xxxx' means "this is a 220 reply, but there will possibly be more  
> lines prefixed '220-', and the last line will be prefixed '220 '.
> 
> A 220 reply is what is expected on opening the connection. Then you answer  
> HELO (or better EHLO), and should get a 250 reply.
> 
> I suspect a bug in berolist.

The extra messages are coming from blackmail, now that you mention it.
Thought that might be a factor. Am working on smartlist anyway.

thanks,
Hamish
-- 
Hamish Moffatt, StudIEAust                    moffatt@yallara.cs.rmit.edu.au
Student, computer science & computer systems engineering.    3rd year, RMIT.
http://hamish.home.ml.org/ (PGP key here)             CPOM: [*****     ] 50%
The opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound truth.  --Bohr


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .


Reply to: