Re: Policy re. static linking of binaries ? (SSH)
I agree. If we do this with some standard binaries we have to check very
carefully which binary is needed.
And I don't think it's a good idea to have init, bash, etc. statically
linked per default.
But without these fsck won't help you much.
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes, Projekt-Manager | topystem Systemhaus GmbH
meskes@topsystem.de | Europark A2, Adenauerstr. 20
meskes@debian.org | 52146 Wuerselen
Go SF49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux! | Tel: (+49) 2405/4670-44
>----------
>Von: bruce@pixar.com[SMTP:bruce@pixar.com]
>Gesendet: Freitag, 11. Juli 1997 20:10
>An: debian-devel@lists.debian.org; Erik Andersen
>Cc: Die Adresse des Empfängers ist unbekannt.
>Betreff: Re: Policy re. static linking of binaries ? (SSH)
>
>From: Erik Andersen <andersen@inconnect.com>
>> Wouldn't it be a good thing to have fsck and a few other system critical
>> binaries staticly linked? I know when my file system is messed up
>> and broken, the last thing I am going to want is to have fsck NOT
>> work because it cant link with some library.
>
>I think the rescue disk is a better solution. It always boots when your
>hard disk filesystem is messed up.
>
> Thanks
>
> Bruce
>--
>Bruce Perens K6BP bruce@pixar.com 510-215-3502
>Finger bruce@master.debian.org for PGP public key.
>PGP fingerprint = 88 6A 15 D0 65 D4 A3 A6 1F 89 6A 76 95 24 87 B3
>
>
>--
>TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
>debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
>Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
>
>
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: