Re: libc6 policy in unstable
On Thu, 12 Jun 1997, Brian White wrote:
> > * July 15th: All libraries *must* be libc6.
> > * July 31th: All packages must be libc6.
>
> That's fine with me. I figure requiring packages only libc6 will also put
> a lot of pressure on library maintainers to get things done.
>
> Do we also want to remove all libc5 dependant packages at some point? I
> think this would be a good idea since otherwise things are going to get
> pretty messed up. We might want to do all three immediately.
* all packages should be libc6 when "hamm" is frozen. (later?)
NB: This would also help us to get rid of the remaining packages that are
a.out.
--
- ** Linux ** +-------------------+ ** WAW ** -
- vincent@debian.org | RENARDIAS Vincent | vincent@waw.com -
- Debian/GNU Linux +-------------------+ http://www.waw.com/ -
- http://www.debian.org/ | WAW (33) 4 91 81 21 45 -
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: