Re: RFC: Splitting manpages into 2 packages

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: RFC: Splitting manpages into 2 packages
From: Ben Pfaff <pfaffben@pilot.msu.edu>
Date: 03 Jun 1997 08:23:20 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 87pvu3an9j.fsf@pilot.msu.edu>
In-reply-to: Nicolás Lichtmaier's message of Mon, 2 Jun 1997 13:41:47 -0300 (ART)
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.970602134052.1998A-100000@localhost>

=?iso-8859-1?Q?Nicol=E1s_Lichtmaier?= <nick@Feedback.com.ar> writes:
>  One package with misc/general manpages and another with development
> manpages. What do you think?

What would be the relative sizes of each?  In theory I'm in favor.
-- 
Ben Pfaff <pfaffben@pilot.msu.edu> 12167 Airport Rd, DeWitt MI 48820, USA
*Note*: New PGP key available at http://www.msu.edu/user/pfaffben/pgp.html


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC: Splitting manpages into 2 packages
  - From: Nicolás Lichtmaier <nick@Feedback.com.ar>

References:
- RFC: Splitting manpages into 2 packages
  - From: Nicolás Lichtmaier <nick@Feedback.com.ar>

Prev by Date: Re: anyone want to package "jade"?
Next by Date: the ncurses "brushfire" -- anybody want to take over the project?
Previous by thread: RFC: Splitting manpages into 2 packages
Next by thread: Re: RFC: Splitting manpages into 2 packages
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread