Re: RFC: Policy for arch specs
Raul Miller wrote:
> On May 31, Galen Hazelwood wrote
> > Perhaps. Anybody have any serious arguments? I think the reason we
> > configure gcc as i486 is so it automatically optimizes for the 486; it's
> > a good middle ground.
> If I remember right, configuring for pentium leaves an executable
> that might not run on 386 or 486.
If gcc actually _did_ any pentium optimizations, that might be true.
Unfortunately, we don't get that until 2.8. (still waiting...)
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to email@example.com .