Re: Bash 2.0 Problems
On Sat, 1 Mar 1997, Brian C. White wrote:
> > But: Since there is no warranted procedure that dselect installs bash
> > after the new packages it broke (i.e. no Breaks: field), we might
> > want to restore bash 1.14.7 in the last minute before Debian 1.3 (or
> > better: one week before).
>
> My feeling is to release 1.3 with the older version of bash and let
> bash 2.0 mature a bit longer for acceptance into the next release.
>
> Comments? What benefits does bash2 give over the older bash?
bash2.0 is fine for me. Been using it for a while, and everything
works fine... except sysklogd which has already been fixed, what bash2.0
is known to break?
--
- ** Linux ** +-------------------+ ** WAW ** -
- vincent@debian.org | RENARDIAS Vincent | vincent@waw.com -
- Debian/GNU Linux +-------------------+ http://www.waw.com/ -
- http://www.debian.org/ | WAW (33) 4 91 81 21 45 -
- | Luminy (33) 4 91 82 85 32 -
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: