Re: Bash 2.0 Problems
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Fri, 28 Feb 1997, Brian C. White wrote:
> What was the end result of the bash 2.0 discussion?
More or less: (Guy, correct me if this is wrong).
bash 2.0 goes to unstable. It replaces current bash and there is no
/bin/bash2. Only this way bugs can be reported and fixed. That's what
unstable is for.
But: Since there is no warranted procedure that dselect installs bash
after the new packages it broke (i.e. no Breaks: field), we might
want to restore bash 1.14.7 in the last minute before Debian 1.3 (or
better: one week before).
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: latin1
iQCVAwUBMxgMZiqK7IlOjMLFAQFYZwP/T7mUXsj76nEgz3r4Eyh4ibWGnmkuJyy9
FjZK/bfc+bje8BtupgDy/CEsj1d18NiW+kj+zFDhH/V66QMFc3wAX3NzwjHko7rX
TSqRqueuzel/9SOmlk3osmRASzNlU63ryHkkGES4/babEnQgr+z6S+h020UcQzz4
p47wdIvJYwI=
=KGjC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
Reply to: