Re: Setuid
On Fri, 15 Nov 1996, Brian C. White wrote:
> >I propose that we institute a stricter policy regarding setuid-root
> >code.
>
> I agree, but along with this policy needs to be a standard set of methods
> (or suggestions) of how people can do the things that are currently being
> handled by having the suid bit set.
>
...
>
> This same thing applied to all packages linked against svgalib, including
> ghostscript.
Since many programs might need to read svgalib, might it be better to do
something like sgid'ing them and make a special group for svgalib.
Just wondering.
Shaya
--
Shaya Potter
spotter@itd.nrl.navy.mil
--
This message was distributed manually by Bruce@debian.org after the list
initially failed to distribute it.
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Setuid
- From: Stuart Lamble <lamble@yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au>
- References:
- Re: Setuid
- From: "Brian C. White" <bcwhite@verisim.com>