Re: The Future of Debian TeX
On Tue, 12 Nov 1996, Stuart Lamble wrote:
> Christian Schwarz <schwarz@monet.m.isar.de> wrote:
> [stuff snipped]
> >BASE: kpathsea, mfbase (was mfbasfnt, mfbin, mflib), texbase (was texbin,
> >texlib, textfm)
>
> Just wondering...were/are texlib and textfm (for example) architecture-
> independant? If so, it may be worthwhile keeping them split out of texbase,
> as it means there is less duplication between the various arch-dependant
> directories. ('Course, if they're fairly small, this argument falls down :)
Oh, I'm sorry. I forgot about the architecture stuff. We will certainly
not mix this. So I will probably create texbin, texlib and mfbin, mflib
packages, where the bin packages are arch dep and the lib packages are
arch indep.
Thanks,
Chris
-- _,, Christian Schwarz
/ o \__ schwarz@monet.m.isar.de, schwarz@debian.org,
! ___; schwarz@mathematik.tu-muenchen.de, bm955877@muenchen.org
\ /
\\\______/ ! PGP-fp: 8F 61 EB 6D CF 23 CA D7 34 05 14 5C C8 DC 22 BA
\ / http://fatman.mathematik.tu-muenchen.de/~schwarz/
-.-.,---,-,-..---,-,-.,----.-.-
"DIE ENTE BLEIBT DRAUSSEN!"
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com
Reply to: