Re: SOURCE (fwd)
> Sender: John Richardson <email@example.com>
> Subject: Re: SOURCE
> > We need volunteers to maintain these source packages and to make new
> > binary packages when appropriate. If a source package is completely
> > missing, then we need a volunteer to put it together. All interested
> > in maintaining a package listed in this file should contact Mike
> > Dickey <firstname.lastname@example.org> for further details. If the
> > distribution currently has a binary package and its source package is
> > not listed here (and you want to put it together :), then please
> > contact Ian Murdock <email@example.com>.
> I'm thinking about putting a Checker package together, but I'd
> like to get it to work for me first! Anyway, so I can catch up
> on things, can someone tell me what the developers mailing list is?
> I'm assuming that checker is a valid package for Debian if noone
> BTW: is anyone updating fvwm? It's up to something like 21e right now.
> The nice part about the newer stuff (except that it has has 4 lines
> of code written by me :) ) is that it handles Motif programs better
> than before. Not that I'm complaining, I can always compile it
> John Richardson "When everything else fails... so will the duct tape.
> firstname.lastname@example.org But have it along anyway." -- David Goodman
John Richardson "When everything else fails... so will the duct tape.
email@example.com But have it along anyway." -- David Goodman