[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Uploaded traceroute-nanog 6.2.2-1 (m68k) to ftp-master



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 18:17:30 +0100
Source: traceroute-nanog
Binary: traceroute-nanog
Architecture: m68k
Version: 6.2.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: buildd m68k user account <buildd@ax.westfalen.de>
Changed-By: Martin A. Godisch <godisch@tcs.inf.tu-dresden.de>
Description: 
 traceroute-nanog - Determine route of packets in TCP/IP networks (NANOG variant)
Closes: 100744 154116 157883 163226 165661 171180 172811 174121
Changes: 
 traceroute-nanog (6.2.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New maintainer upload, closes: #174121. Thanks for the NMUs.
   * New upstream release, closes: #154116, #171180, #172811.
     Removed several patches which are now in upstream.
   * Fixed source for Hurd, closes: #163226; fixed --help screen.
   * Added debconf question for suid installation.
   * debian/changelog: removed Emacs cruft.
   * debian/compat: updated debhelper compatibility level.
   * debian/control: updated conflicts to suidmanager (<< 0.52),
     updated Debian standards version.
   * debian/copyright: updated download location.
   * debian/docs: dropped 0_readme.txt from binary package because
     it does not carry information useful to the end user.
   * debian/links: added symlink for /usr/bin, closes: #100744,
     symlink will be removed on non-suid installation.
   * Installed Linda and Lintian overrides to silence suid warning.
   * debian/traceroute.8: incorporated documenting parts of the
     code into the manual page, closes: #157883, #165661.
   * Thanks to Daniel Kobras <kobras@tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de>.
Files: 
 ecf1c458792bdaa407a34a74739a9688 27836 net extra traceroute-nanog_6.2.2-1_m68k.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+FjUrWgZ1HEtaPf0RAnQHAKCM7dbF5gxJpkNX5u6ADTk3V976dgCfR2se
uq+2xjbaqJNz9rk8CaGit80=
=58tq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




Reply to: