[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Uploaded gnupg 1.2.0-1 (m68k) to ftp-master



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2002 22:26:25 +0100
Source: gnupg
Binary: gnupg
Architecture: m68k
Version: 1.2.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: buildd m68k user account <buildd@ax.westfalen.de>
Changed-By: James Troup <james@nocrew.org>
Description: 
 gnupg      - GNU privacy guard - a free PGP replacement.
Closes: 64607 147760 149212 151973 156871 157750 161817
Changes: 
 gnupg (1.2.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream version.  Closes: #161817.
    * --options no longer mis-handles a directory as an argument.  Closes: #151973
    * gpg now prompts before sending all keys to the keyserver.  Closes: #64607
    * There is now a gnupg(7) manpage.  Closes: #157750
    * The permission checking has been sanitized and handles non-home-dir
      keyrings better.  Closes: #147760
    * notation data longer than 5 characters is now handled.  Closes: #156871
    * an abort when setting trust levels in a czech locale has been fixed.
      Closes: #149212
   * debian/rules (binary-arch): there are no more modules, adjust
     accordingly.
   * debian/postinst, debian/prerm: remove; no longer do /usr/doc symlinks.
   * debian/rules (binary-arch): don't install obsolete postinst or prerm.
   * debian/rules (binary-arch): gzip gnupg.7 too.
   * debian/rules (build): pass --libexecdir=/usr/lib/gnupg to configure.
   * debian/rules (binary-arch): likewise, pass suitable libexcedir
     argument to make install.
   * debian/control (Standards-Version): update to 3.5.7.0.
   * debian/copyright: update URL and date.
   * debian/rules: update dates and version.
Files: 
 fd52e83438249c7f00c9b211f96b28a2 1223004 utils standard gnupg_1.2.0-1_m68k.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE9jq1TWgZ1HEtaPf0RAlzPAJ4lgBJ40i5zX5hayoL6FGgHW4zjEwCeOKtl
UpkSWx+oprHCZ9G02Q223L0=
=+kpo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




Reply to: