Uploaded cyrus21-imapd 2.1.9-1 (m68k) to erlangen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 18:51:32 -0300
Source: cyrus21-imapd
Binary: libcyrus-imap-perl cyrus21-admin cyrus21-murder cyrus21-common cyrus21-imapd cyrus21-clients cyrus21-dev cyrus21-docs cyrus21-pop3d
Architecture: m68k
Version: 2.1.9-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon <buildd@kullervo.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de>
Changed-By: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org>
Description:
cyrus21-clients - Cyrus mail system (test clients)
cyrus21-common - Cyrus mail system (common files)
cyrus21-dev - Cyrus mail system (developer files)
cyrus21-imapd - Cyrus mail system (IMAP support)
cyrus21-murder - Cyrus mail system (proxies and aggregator)
cyrus21-pop3d - Cyrus mail system (POP3 support)
libcyrus-imap-perl - Interface to Cyrus imap client imclient library
Changes:
cyrus21-imapd (2.1.9-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream source
+ Fix stuff that Debian got right since 2.1.5-8
+ Better handling of errors in connecting to LMTP servers for deliver and
lmtpproxyd
* Patchset 4280,4281 from CVS: use authisa() for cmd_login in imapd and
proxyd
Files:
25f930ffe276a986d2b9eda591c8a989 1417650 mail extra cyrus21-common_2.1.9-1_m68k.deb
3c39917c68cad74266ee89a1dc6dfe3b 506104 mail extra cyrus21-imapd_2.1.9-1_m68k.deb
8a92f49bb7c3ad493846563a1e03be0f 69954 mail extra cyrus21-pop3d_2.1.9-1_m68k.deb
795d087028e6328dc7e65036c8e4842e 423032 mail extra cyrus21-murder_2.1.9-1_m68k.deb
5ba99cb3572787107fbce207fbf6650d 83686 mail extra cyrus21-clients_2.1.9-1_m68k.deb
e84379a8554b05a879cf80176ecc4682 228550 devel extra cyrus21-dev_2.1.9-1_m68k.deb
ab93ed22caa2260cc30359cff67df9ae 114176 devel extra libcyrus-imap-perl_2.1.9-1_m68k.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.6 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
iD8DBQE9emU6cS3JWD3FdvcRAhbtAJ0WMWh4skfGpDgsFaqvkdCnQFwoiQCeMGeG
aw0/JBqsA7gv5pwoCz1Uybw=
=/Z3G
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: