[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Uploaded gtk+2.0 2.0.5-2 (m68k) to ftp-master



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Thu,  4 Jul 2002 00:18:53 +0900
Source: gtk+2.0
Binary: gtk2.0-examples libgtk2.0-dbg libgtk-common libgtk2.0-dev libgtk2.0-doc libgtk2.0-common libgtk2.0-0
Architecture: m68k
Version: 2.0.5-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k (crest) buildd <rick@def.debian.net>
Changed-By: Akira TAGOH <tagoh@debian.org>
Description: 
 gtk2.0-examples - Examples files for the GTK+ 2.0
 libgtk-common - Empty package for upgrading libgtkx.x-common
 libgtk2.0-0 - The GTK+ graphical user interface library
 libgtk2.0-common - Common files for the GTK+ graphical user interface library
 libgtk2.0-dbg - The GTK+ libraries and debugging symbols
 libgtk2.0-dev - Development files for the GTK+ library.
Closes: 151439 151668
Changes: 
 gtk+2.0 (2.0.5-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * debian/rules: add --with-xinput=xfree. (closes: Bug#151668)
   * debian/control:
     - add Conflicts: libgdkxft0 to avoid some problem. (closes: Bug#151439).
     - changed a summary from 'Dummy' to 'Empty'.
Files: 
 947cbafdce4a578a876df7bce600ebeb 1351198 libs optional libgtk2.0-0_2.0.5-2_m68k.deb
 6aae98b98385796d0b6462b1ed474b65 1104 misc optional libgtk-common_2.0.5-2_m68k.deb
 2aa8378b3f01486e2b77c5c7e468dc45 769192 misc optional libgtk2.0-common_2.0.5-2_m68k.deb
 49ac803aa5252d0198091ad8420dd943 177264 devel optional libgtk2.0-dev_2.0.5-2_m68k.deb
 2113109b2d7641b418b305060663e381 2858016 devel extra libgtk2.0-dbg_2.0.5-2_m68k.deb
 bcd6700f404c2ad7284aaaca4efd0774 228102 x11 extra gtk2.0-examples_2.0.5-2_m68k.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE9NWqbEycGpQPNsdIRAph2AKCU41Y4pU6856a2xbKVb7ZHu4P97QCfShJc
XR5H+G9rwxblCi45mEAmeG8=
=JlJ5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-m68k-changes-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org



Reply to: