[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Uploaded fetchmail 5.9.10-1 (m68k) to erlangen



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 21:01:56 -0300
Source: fetchmail
Binary: fetchmailconf fetchmail fetchmail-common
Architecture: m68k
Version: 5.9.10-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon <buildd@kullervo.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de>
Changed-By: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org>
Description: 
 fetchmail  - POP3, APOP, IMAP mail gatherer/forwarder (crypto-crippled binary)
Closes: 60805 115355 137539
Changes: 
 fetchmail (5.9.10-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * New upstream source
     + Security fix: don't trust the message count passed back by the server
     + Matt Kraai's patch for supporting STLS over POP3
     + Jakub Ulanowski's patch to fix SSL fingerprint handling
     + ESMTP AUTH support from Wojciech Polak <polak@lodz.pdi.net>
       (closes: #60805)
   * Apply Byrial Jensen <byrial@image.dk>'s patches for i18n of new
     5.9.10 messages
   * Add French template, thanks to Denis Barbier <barbier@debian.org>
     (closes: #137539)
   * Apply patch from Sunil Shetye <shetye@bombay.retortsoft.com> to
     correctly signal failures to open/create a logfile as such, instead
     of stupid "dup(): illegal FD" cryptic errors
   * Apply a modified version of a patch from Sylvain Benoist
     <sylvainb@whitepj.com>, to avoid file descriptor leaks on open
     timeouts and reenable SSL connect timeouts (closes: #115355).
     Grr, I never got that last email from the bug submitter, the
     freaking BTS sent me the spam, though...
Files: 
 0b79d32e556f0ce5a5b1423877dbab67 247466 mail optional fetchmail_5.9.10-1_m68k.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.6 and Gnu Privacy Guard <http://www.gnupg.org/>

iEYEARECAAYFAjyVrLcACgkQcS3JWD3FdveHcwCeKfHg64uX8KXKH9VTq6BrbiQx
MBUAn27UdfKePwIAE+HQ3YFAtZLOd38D
=4I+r
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: