Uploaded gimp-print 4.2.0-2 (m68k) to erlangen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2001 09:47:05 -0500
Source: gimp-print
Binary: gimpprint-doc libgimpprint1 escputil cupsys-driver-gimpprint gimpprint-locales gimp1.2-print libgimpprint-doc libgimpprint-dev
Architecture: m68k
Version: 4.2.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon <buildd@q650.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de>
Changed-By: Eric Sharkey <sharkey@debian.org>
Description:
cupsys-driver-gimpprint - gimp-print printer driver for CUPS
escputil - a utility for Epson Stylus printers
gimp1.2-print - print plugin for the GIMP
libgimpprint-dev - header files for compiling programs with libgimpprint
libgimpprint1 - library necessary to use gimp-print programs
Closes: 121597
Changes:
gimp-print (4.2.0-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Fix build dependencies, Closes: #121597
* Fix broken gimpprint-doc.doc-base pointing to old index filename
* Fix libgimpprint.postinst to use 'if' instead of 'case', removing a
lintian warning. (Roger Leigh)
* Split out the message catalogues from the libgimpprint package into
a new gimpprint-locales package to avoid filename conflicts when
multiple libgimpprint versions are installed concurrently. (RL)
* Add libgimpprint-doc.doc-base (existed for six months, but was never
added to CVS!) (RL)
Files:
460dd86efd0b212b03885cdb237f65e9 137962 graphics optional gimp1.2-print_4.2.0-2_m68k.deb
7b540e08ddadbd903de794b3e1d89835 1628384 graphics optional cupsys-driver-gimpprint_4.2.0-2_m68k.deb
67ea862f15001043d83fced56239ca8e 537066 devel optional libgimpprint-dev_4.2.0-2_m68k.deb
b5b50e4e7f79131586c26b295f7f3690 500412 libs optional libgimpprint1_4.2.0-2_m68k.deb
5ad57eaf5ed307c200eb1cd73bae2c3e 33480 misc optional escputil_4.2.0-2_m68k.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Weitere Infos: siehe http://www.gnupg.org
iEYEARECAAYFAjwcl0EACgkQjH3TJU9qR47lLQCcC5WWXEZKMRWK77/0FzUTSElo
bYMAnA1BfcAwu7w+HGq5EEmfpkypLVwm
=T/PQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: