Uploaded jade 1.2.1-24 (m68k) to erlangen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2001 20:35:50 -0500
Source: jade
Binary: jade libsp1 sp libsp1-dev
Architecture: m68k
Version: 1.2.1-24
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon <buildd@q650.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de>
Changed-By: Adam Di Carlo <aph@debian.org>
Description:
jade - James Clark's DSSSL Engine
libsp1 - Runtime library for James Clark's SP suite
libsp1-dev - James Clark's SP suite, developer support
sp - James Clark's SGML parsing tools
Closes: 115913 115915
Changes:
jade (1.2.1-24) unstable; urgency=low
.
* update for new Debian SGML layout, catalog files, and search path;
closes: #115913, #115915
* depend on sgml-base 1.07 or better
* remove useless sp.catalog conffile
* bump libsp1 requirement to this version due to search path change,
which is a compile time option
* add build-dependency on gettext
* policy compliant to 3.5.6
* debian/rules: more debhelperification, suggestions from Roger Leigh
* move to DH_COMPAT 3, require debhelper 3.0 or better
* debian/control: add build-depends on gettext, remove redundant dependency
on autotools-dev
* provide FOT.tex as an example, I guess that's for an example of how to
render FOT output -- not completely clear...
* we provide xml.soc in /usr/share/sgml/declaration/xml.soc, as expected
by psgmls and probably other tools
Files:
bdd15f3b751dd6c55b003f50110b09a3 152334 text optional sp_1.3.4-1.2.1-24_m68k.deb
01e536e53191a42b3bfe21d574a9fca8 1484692 libs optional libsp1_1.3.4-1.2.1-24_m68k.deb
65c26a9d3e4d46abf0a332ccf350e91b 1722996 devel optional libsp1-dev_1.3.4-1.2.1-24_m68k.deb
0099e136c86db54a203a4a1bb5945c6c 269946 text optional jade_1.2.1-24_m68k.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: noconv
iQCVAwUBO/JG0G547I3m3eHJAQH0VwP+IDJEco33Ynw568QneFL0fCWF2UJ8Egde
ufgO2IxPCqnp8rC/psk6gp/d6E7HWyAhg4E0P19MyzRJ2W5upj2pnG0LjL21sAFf
3TsB+/b+8r/Nj4QfZ+j5hvq3KJxaleGzFDRxfZa6b6xstswTIQTvw+AEnGo6TbXe
i/P0N4cQzLI=
=ji+Z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: