[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Uploaded gtk+licq 0.51-1 (m68k) to erlangen



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed,  8 Aug 2001 19:56:00 -0500
Source: gtk+licq
Binary: licq-plugin-gnome licq-plugin-gtk+
Architecture: m68k
Version: 0.51-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: buildd m68k user account <buildd@ipmsun1.mathematik.uni-karlsruhe.de>
Changed-By: Zed Pobre <zed@debian.org>
Description: 
 licq-plugin-gnome - Graphical front-end plugin for LICQ using Gnome libraries
 licq-plugin-gtk+ - Graphical front-end plugin for LICQ using GTK+ libraries
Closes: 82932 83451 83452 85805 88648 92778 93755 105833
Changes: 
 gtk+licq (0.51-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream version
     * Localization should be fixed (closes: #82932, #85805)
     * Copy should be working (closes: #93755)
     * Options->Firewall has been completely redone (closes: #88648)
     * GTK_CFLAGS updated in src/Makefile, probably closes: #92778 (feel
       free to reopen if it didn't)
     * g_free(tmpname) commented out in src/spell.cpp (closes: #105833)
       (this was apparantly a workaround for a bug in an older pspell which
       broke the newer ones once pspell got fixed)
     * New message icon and history crash bugs fixed (closes: #83451, #83452)
     * Crash on removing user fixed.
   * Standards-Version 3.5.6 (no changes needed)
   * --sysconfdir=/etc set at configure stages (needed with this version to
     avoid /usr/etc problems)
   * Remove ltconfig at clean stage
Files: 
 b9df42ac2de90d8c813506cdffcb500b 4635256 net optional licq-plugin-gtk+_0.51-1_m68k.deb
 3484494ba8fe4088ab99132231a284e4 5729838 net optional licq-plugin-gnome_0.51-1_m68k.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBO3Q0cm547I3m3eHJAQEp/AP+O1kqn9gZtuecFrcHaCY/WHnVMbLhDTcO
35d7WI2Xsdmk87nS7an1Lj9uHcIvWplTfPcTTZmoty/9QtdLph2JjS9zuvTkNYP5
ElnIRoXDyOYA7jK3WYD7Ph1+n2aOJz5e3HmF3JuWzdxlZ3AiPVqPj4jv1vQgg25o
7bUciFJQbqk=
=OB3x
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: