[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Uploaded vim 5.8-1 (m68k) to erlangen



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun,  3 Jun 2001 23:28:21 +0200
Source: vim
Binary: vim-python vim-tiny vim-gtk vim-rt vim vim-tcl vim-perl
Architecture: m68k
Version: 5.8-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon <buildd@q650.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de>
Changed-By: Wichert Akkerman <wakkerma@debian.org>
Description: 
 vim        - Vi IMproved - enhanced vi editor
 vim-gtk    - Vi IMproved - GTK version
 vim-perl   - Vi IMproved - with perl support
 vim-python - Vi IMproved - with python support
 vim-tcl    - Vi IMproved - with tcl support
 vim-tiny   - Vi IMproved - minimal build
Closes: 48587 65244 66882 67438 67737 74105 83825 87291 92065 93882 95227 98101 98731
Changes: 
 vim (5.8-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream bugfix version. Closes: Bug#98731,#74105,#67438,#66882,#65244
   * Use libgtk1.2-dev in the Build-Depends.
     Closes: Bug#98101,#67737,#83825,#87291,#93882,#95227,#92065
   * doc symlinks were fixed earlier already. Closes: Bug#48587
   * exuberant-tags is no longer part of the vim source, update debian/rules
     accordingly
Files: 
 0ad0710c483263c1bdb6e36f92bed978 383366 editors optional vim-gtk_5.8-1_m68k.deb
 92de6e3d5efd6acb7ed530e9682454bf 393484 editors optional vim-perl_5.8-1_m68k.deb
 d7ef4ec3e54ceabd47f9f766af0697b3 531040 editors optional vim-python_5.8-1_m68k.deb
 d023e6200ec59e050812f5a3fa67b813 391296 editors optional vim-tcl_5.8-1_m68k.deb
 0d90991ab215ccec45d2ec32e2285be8 213392 editors optional vim-tiny_5.8-1_m68k.deb
 5e3979ed3c25442a531ea0a3873fb845 303006 editors optional vim_5.8-1_m68k.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBOx3cFm547I3m3eHJAQEuygP/UGid+VVcLtLy20UbIUr8Kx/zA9a87Xv9
1SqO4f7s081KVV9waTa2tUa6tHkC/6CG/WxcK67XCkMPD4ZrVdcMbBppIRqufP3X
UCXikMH+F3bzcCtYE7hm/Gmgmgy6WeBDsUItIc0I1Xtp5SbaPsNGyhR761OVoPEJ
4QoBcW35KLo=
=NchK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: