Uploaded gftp 2.0.8-1 (m68k) to erlangen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 14:12:44 +0100
Source: gftp
Binary: gftp-text gftp-gtk gftp gftp-common
Architecture: m68k
Version: 2.0.8-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon <buildd@kullervo.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Changed-By: Josip Rodin <jrodin@jagor.srce.hr>
Description:
gftp - X/GTK+ FTP client
gftp-common - shared files for other gFTP packages
gftp-gtk - X/GTK+ FTP client
gftp-text - a colored FTP client using GLib
Closes: 77032 81629 84319 89577 94394
Changes:
gftp (2.0.8-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream version:
+ no longer vulnerable to format string bugs, closes: #94394.
+ no longer crashes when downloading multiple files, closes: #89577.
+ fixed problem with domains in local hosts, closes: #77032.
+ fixed corruption of ASCII files, closes: #81629.
+ no longer stores passwords in index.db, closes: #84319.
* Split package into three parts:
+ gftp-gtk: contains the version of the program that needs X and
GTK+/Glib
+ gftp-text: contains the version of the program that only needs
console and GLib
+ gftp-common: contains the shared stuff, namely the locales and the
manpage.
The `gftp' binary is handled using alternatives (that script checking
$DISPLAY looks nice, but it'd be a conflict).
* gftp is a dummy package now, and it will install all three of these.
* Standards-Version: 3.5.2.
Files:
2af63283c006c486b01f74f3a02f4d6b 10154 net optional gftp_2.0.8-1_m68k.deb
225bec6bc487f702f6fa235b56c41539 191894 net optional gftp-gtk_2.0.8-1_m68k.deb
bf657dd453e279b110e69eb58f57ee0d 54770 net optional gftp-text_2.0.8-1_m68k.deb
fb5f0a871b4984745ada5934e3cb4bb5 189518 net optional gftp-common_2.0.8-1_m68k.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.5 and Gnu Privacy Guard <http://www.gnupg.org/>
iEYEARECAAYFAjrv35sACgkQcS3JWD3FdvdLnQCfcO+/+7MWjQW1diu/giO5Jhjz
uh8AoIMhJOT9SI2mTQqBdrY8upzGm8Vz
=/rh7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: