[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Uploaded logcheck 1.1.1-9 (m68k) to erlangen



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 11:03:57 +0100
Source: logcheck
Binary: logcheck
Architecture: m68k
Version: 1.1.1-9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon <buildd@kullervo.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Changed-By: Rene Mayrhofer <rene.mayrhofer@vianova.at>
Description: 
 logcheck   - Mails anomalies in the system logfiles to the administrator
Closes: 86678 86726 87225
Changes: 
 logcheck (1.1.1-9) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Split the logcheck.ignore.* files into smaller pieces, one for each
     package that generates the log messages. Now there are directories
     /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.(workstation|server|paranoid) and
     /etc/logcheck/ignore.d will be a link to one of those equivalent to the
     handling of /etc/logcheck/logcheck.ignore. This is only the default
     configuration, you can of course remove the link and create your own
     directory.
   * Fixed a stupid bug in logcheck.sh that caused logcheck to mail some
     messages to the admin even if the last file in ignore.d or
     violations.ignore.d should have filtered it out.
     Closes: #87225
   * Now use debhelper version 3.
   * This bug (using '\(' and '\)' instead of '(' and ')' for automount rules)
     has been fixed as of version 1.1.1-7.
     Closes: #86678
   * There should be no more problems with duplicate entries in
     logcheck.ignore.workstation, because now this file is quite minimal and
     not generated from diffs to logcheck.ignore.paranoid anymore.
     Closes: #86726
Files: 
 69c54f076f1cd607d5b2adac249f61b7 37178 admin optional logcheck_1.1.1-9_m68k.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.5 and Gnu Privacy Guard <http://www.gnupg.org/>

iEYEARECAAYFAjqnaUcACgkQcS3JWD3FdveAGwCfcz33UK2xJrYcfxov36VrcwO/
NWsAn2bw+KFTjwaLuCFlZ35nOdmRjRBI
=urgi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: