Re: review of uhexen2 package

To: debian-devel-games@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: review of uhexen2 package
From: Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 12:34:05 +0800
Message-id: <CAKTje6F=4JxQkBcADLfjQFLZKeNHPmFAij=Qt+WofFUJhDfofg@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <20120910041543.GA29694@io.zumbi.com.ar>
References: <4FF14E4C.5040306@redhat.com> <CAKTje6GsoUQTtpTbbSMnm=4iRp_jy_2HPcjrR2BsmXReZD2Kng@mail.gmail.com> <4FF1C640.8010508@gmx.de> <CAKTje6EQAgzASoptSdrhV8dhO2cQzyJx3CT1AsZyui1_23zwDg@mail.gmail.com> <CAKTje6FT630POZ_cDwLHtiXWcAL7_+n2MSOtowOia+Se8+h5UQ@mail.gmail.com> <4FF77B6C.4080103@gmx.de> <501D01D8.4030608@gmx.de> <20120831160851.GE24379@debian> <20120910024707.GA29571@io.zumbi.com.ar> <CAKTje6END5YGGf93JMYXT3LKcOMVR-mAB-FEUM1-e39g5qTeEQ@mail.gmail.com> <20120910041543.GA29694@io.zumbi.com.ar>

On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:15 PM, gustavo panizzo wrote:

> why? i see both examples on the archive and no mention on policy or
> developers reference

http://lists.debian.org/87oblh5tv3.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Reply to:

References:
- Re: review of uhexen2 package
  - From: gustavo panizzo <gfa@zumbi.com.ar>
- Re: review of uhexen2 package
  - From: Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org>
- Re: review of uhexen2 package
  - From: "gustavo panizzo <gfa>" <gfa@zumbi.com.ar>

Prev by Date: Re: review of uhexen2 package
Next by Date: Re: review of uhexen2 package
Previous by thread: Re: review of uhexen2 package
Next by thread: Re: review of uhexen2 package
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread