Thank you very much for working on AstroMenace and for the initial packaging work and also thanks to Boris for getting in touch with upstream. On Thu, 13. Dec 15:22 Dmitry Smirnov <onlyjob@member.fsf.org> wrote: > On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 06:52:36 Boris Pek wrote: > > After small discussion [1] I can give brief info about current situation > > with licenses for data files: > > * There are ttf fonts under own free licenses which compatible with GPLv3. > > There are bundled fonts from "fonts-liberation" and "fonts-freefont-ttf". > > However source of one font file is unclear: > > RAW_VFS_DATA/FONT/Ubuntu-B.ttf I was curious about which font package Ubuntu-B.ttf belongs to and it seems it is part of ttf-ubuntu-font-family in Ubuntu. However if i understand bug report #603157 [1] correctly, ftp-masters consider the Ubuntu Font License to be non-free at the moment. It seems another blocker is that you can't build the fonts from source with tools in main. Maybe we can substitute Ubuntu-B.ttf with a free font? > > * Another part of 3D models was licensed from third-party design studio. > > And these files come under proprietary license. > > Now main developer is going to re-licence these proprietary files under > > CC BY-SA and to update main file with description of all copyrights and > > licenses used in program. > > The problem is that some files are sourceless, right? This seems to be the difficult part here. Regards, Markus [1] http://bugs.debian.org/603157
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature