Re: supertuxkart 0.7.3
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Tobias Hansen <thansen@debian.org> wrote:
> Am 10.12.2012 00:04, schrieb Vincent Cheng:
>> On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Tobias Hansen <thansen@debian.org> wrote:
>>> If it's a bug in irrlicht, you can find the patch in the irrlicht svn. If
>>
>> Uhmm, thanks? Especially after tagging #677609 and #679837 with
>> 'help', I was hoping for something a bit more detailed/specific...
>>
>> [2] https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/supertuxkart/ticket/689
>
> I have not looked into it. My point was that modifying a library to
> match the needs of one of its reverse dependencies is a bad idea. After
> looking at your [2], it looks like that is what this is about.
No, I haven't modified irrlicht to meet the needs of supertuxkart.
It's an option that I have considered though; either that, or just use
supertuxkart's embedded copy of irrlicht starting with the next
upstream release. I'm leaning towards the latter because it's the
least painful option.
Vincent
Reply to: