Accepted gnustep-base 1.29.0-6 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2023 17:39:40 +0300
Source: gnustep-base
Architecture: source
Version: 1.29.0-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian GNUstep maintainers <pkg-gnustep-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Yavor Doganov <yavor@gnu.org>
Changes:
gnustep-base (1.29.0-6) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* debian/patches/hurd-nsurlconnection.patch: Delete; issue gone somehow.
* debian/patches/nscalendardate-hppa+ppc.patch: Enable and refresh.
Mark as Debian-specific as it's not a real fix to be forwarded.
* debian/patches/NSURL-tests-new-url.patch: Explicitly mark as
Forwarded: not-needed. Lintian correctly assumes that it doesn't need
forwarding as it's taken from upstream, however udd.d.o does not.
* debian/patches/TestHelper-category-interface.patch: Likewise.
Checksums-Sha1:
d8c01d101cd57cb1c74c769b4f223c900892e436 2992 gnustep-base_1.29.0-6.dsc
909f8db4c38c8aa205ae6b1f9d7c670fb9fdd9ab 35744 gnustep-base_1.29.0-6.debian.tar.xz
a238783f78f5ece114e0259721f58242191cdf8a 7836 gnustep-base_1.29.0-6_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
04369d1c841e15c01afea2bff7938b43cb0de1daf8ee1d1f09151d5217f5d7bf 2992 gnustep-base_1.29.0-6.dsc
fb00cd5f55443eab5e1dec8ce5cb1334e4937913c4bb54fc9024b4a17f5e20fe 35744 gnustep-base_1.29.0-6.debian.tar.xz
9ef3864727c1262c8c7dcbc1763228e2f1dcc1f3224d3f0199c3d7b9d176ac13 7836 gnustep-base_1.29.0-6_source.buildinfo
Files:
a78999458fbaf5010efa6d73776d682c 2992 gnustep optional gnustep-base_1.29.0-6.dsc
11456f0e5130aaaa140280a4f4f86318 35744 gnustep optional gnustep-base_1.29.0-6.debian.tar.xz
e2b28e07165d407f78d101c8dac5c9d2 7836 gnustep optional gnustep-base_1.29.0-6_source.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=e1WH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: