[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted rust-link-cplusplus 1.0.9-1 (source) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2023 11:29:31 +0200
Source: rust-link-cplusplus
Architecture: source
Version: 1.0.9-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Rust Maintainers <pkg-rust-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net>
Changed-By: Matthias Geiger <werdahias@riseup.net>
Changes:
 rust-link-cplusplus (1.0.9-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Package link-cplusplus 1.0.9 from crates.io using debcargo 2.6.0
   * Removed inactive uploader, added my new mail address
Checksums-Sha1:
 1137cfa901aac11777ad28faea809997cb5acea9 2252 rust-link-cplusplus_1.0.9-1.dsc
 677e00dd75765b114c0f00ae8c2284c3e2b6cebf 7484 rust-link-cplusplus_1.0.9.orig.tar.gz
 a261e864c2cb6f389b765c391cad49616f3c4b37 3268 rust-link-cplusplus_1.0.9-1.debian.tar.xz
 29ead976093abed5b75dd9a21c0b4fe5f3e301e5 7286 rust-link-cplusplus_1.0.9-1_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 fd4cfb7578432f6271c74312ef16d004bbe46f275cc92a9ffba51e631e652552 2252 rust-link-cplusplus_1.0.9-1.dsc
 9d240c6f7e1ba3a28b0249f774e6a9dd0175054b52dfbb61b16eb8505c3785c9 7484 rust-link-cplusplus_1.0.9.orig.tar.gz
 feea9ed2768980cad62df15cb9522b3a38c5b3a8466a13ed1cc6cfe05bc76b9e 3268 rust-link-cplusplus_1.0.9-1.debian.tar.xz
 2f99d70c32bf8d0fedfb2ccd7bfeaae3ad6921ee9d496919767ca5ab300f3b95 7286 rust-link-cplusplus_1.0.9-1_source.buildinfo
Files:
 00ead51642d60801588fcffcde1452e2 2252 rust optional rust-link-cplusplus_1.0.9-1.dsc
 d6c6a27e29d9270a2ac318eacdf8e436 7484 rust optional rust-link-cplusplus_1.0.9.orig.tar.gz
 9cb1c083ca17cea41573f72f6b090150 3268 rust optional rust-link-cplusplus_1.0.9-1.debian.tar.xz
 a5ab1a70b382ac97c4dc0ecc61984cd0 7286 rust optional rust-link-cplusplus_1.0.9-1_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=uklp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: