Accepted kernel-handbook 1.0.21 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 08 May 2023 23:17:30 +0200
Source: kernel-handbook
Architecture: source
Version: 1.0.21
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian kernel team <debian-kernel@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Ben Hutchings <benh@debian.org>
Closes: 1022061 1023773
Changes:
kernel-handbook (1.0.21) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Try to reduce pain points in rebuilding official kernel packages
(Closes: #1022061):
- Reorder sections in "Common kernel-related tasks" to reduce confusion
- Deprecate older versions of test-patches
- Recommend changing ABI name before rebuilding
- Add command to enable parallel builds when invoking make directly
- Avoid using fakeroot
* Remove obsolete text referring to "patchlevels" in source packages
* Remove redundant "bash" from debian/bin/test-patches command lines
* Update instructions for disabling debug info (Closes: #1023773)
* Update instructions for building linux-headers-common package
* Update copyright years
Checksums-Sha1:
b59d48c1b9c432cd64775fb4c77103a2373596e8 1705 kernel-handbook_1.0.21.dsc
38d4ae496b0bc7ea7d0eeb2b981353de522b21ab 53492 kernel-handbook_1.0.21.tar.xz
594de045515160dfa45a90fb6d732d804a2b2c59 6067 kernel-handbook_1.0.21_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
24ced33f5571f9070bd31f0c14a4e537117e1bc5b4e69ae4ec951bc2d2685265 1705 kernel-handbook_1.0.21.dsc
f7e10eb057c04167c268b79d6961f0c651eed3639f0b79443398c26b04c60459 53492 kernel-handbook_1.0.21.tar.xz
40c91509671777548ec5e597852de383705d234759cf48665ce97e8b89eeb170 6067 kernel-handbook_1.0.21_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
99d8794108de0d3861af518ec81b03ec 1705 doc optional kernel-handbook_1.0.21.dsc
c0d9abff69d581f5091fa1865a2881c9 53492 doc optional kernel-handbook_1.0.21.tar.xz
6d137d4144e6e689c706c0ee0a6ce6a5 6067 doc optional kernel-handbook_1.0.21_amd64.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=Rytp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: