Accepted gcc-12 12.2.0-9 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2022 09:40:42 +0100
Source: gcc-12
Architecture: source
Version: 12.2.0-9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian GCC Maintainers <debian-gcc@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>
Closes: 1009286 1022935 1023324
Changes:
gcc-12 (12.2.0-9) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Update to git 20221103 from the gcc-12 branch.
- Fix PR c++/107358, PR c++/105774, PR tree-optimization/107121,
PR c/107001, PR c/106981, PR c++/106829.
* Fix PR ada/107475, proposed patch.
* gm2-12-doc: Add missing Breaks+Replaces to gm2-12. Closes: #1023324.
* Remove the armel specific libstdc++ symbols file. Closes: #1022935.
* Build libatomic in the rtlibs stage (Helmut Grohne). Closes: #1009286.
Checksums-Sha1:
56bd0bb2221425ba2053124927dcecabc4e799a0 27501 gcc-12_12.2.0-9.dsc
cce44224ca02a6fd3e0563718e02231d4efbe1ae 1610684 gcc-12_12.2.0-9.debian.tar.xz
4cb1004fe99487e9bc46c8a839ad2acf70e3bd84 9672 gcc-12_12.2.0-9_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
63279c981d508ab170e62409398ca662818b00f498011671f3d1f2d69f09983c 27501 gcc-12_12.2.0-9.dsc
f0d55cb27b02d531047400eefa2ed898fbb8ce55a6b7cc4213e6b398bf3607e1 1610684 gcc-12_12.2.0-9.debian.tar.xz
4d646c9f700ac71073f3a99e5cb130a5e8b605ebc401810fee8caa00ebe62946 9672 gcc-12_12.2.0-9_source.buildinfo
Files:
e778abeff9f10bad0ed344fd5ec79ee3 27501 devel optional gcc-12_12.2.0-9.dsc
45f96e342e9f20535b60f51e83f2e725 1610684 devel optional gcc-12_12.2.0-9.debian.tar.xz
a2e250a0581c35f3f2c4f06842318e89 9672 devel optional gcc-12_12.2.0-9_source.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=e7sX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: