Accepted rocm-smi-lib 5.2.0-1 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2022 19:00:36 +0200
Source: rocm-smi-lib
Architecture: source
Version: 5.2.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: ROCm Team <debian-ai@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Étienne Mollier <emollier@debian.org>
Changes:
rocm-smi-lib (5.2.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* New upstream version
* Reorder sequence of d/control fields by cme (routine-update)
* d/{*.install,not-installed}: adjust to new posix layout.
* d/librocm-smi-dev.docs: update documents location.
* d/control: remove build-dep to dh-exec: not in use anymore.
* d/rules: refman.pdf renaming not needed anymore.
* d/*.symbols: append new symbols with this release.
* d/*.symbols: adjust for 32-bit architectures support.
* d/copyright: remove files which are not shipped anymore.
* Add 0005-dotdot.patch: fix library location when running rocm-smi.
* Adjust 0002-use-soversioned-library.patch: fix rsmiBindings.py too.
Checksums-Sha1:
561ccf8116808e40b8bd80f39636e9dd16b4e39b 2470 rocm-smi-lib_5.2.0-1.dsc
f0c01a511c779bf066664c036f3a0bde4a8f5130 1549993 rocm-smi-lib_5.2.0.orig.tar.gz
e67d3fa0de59a005355ac970d10ab3dc6f785144 84216 rocm-smi-lib_5.2.0-1.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
f6effac0b7664738a64ddb60488983ff605aa58eba296abf3f322ba466283834 2470 rocm-smi-lib_5.2.0-1.dsc
7bce567ff4e087598eace2cae72d24c98b2bcc93af917eafa61ec9d1e8ef4477 1549993 rocm-smi-lib_5.2.0.orig.tar.gz
7aa60c8eef4bfc07be8082923f34906cccdb08ec1d2c8f7f63f99146d10a9f81 84216 rocm-smi-lib_5.2.0-1.debian.tar.xz
Files:
adc14fec340b78367624f178c95cf8d6 2470 devel optional rocm-smi-lib_5.2.0-1.dsc
058b9b643ad1157d57e7142bc506cdda 1549993 devel optional rocm-smi-lib_5.2.0.orig.tar.gz
61518ef8f9b859dd2e0bb1f568ecd70d 84216 devel optional rocm-smi-lib_5.2.0-1.debian.tar.xz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=a7FC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: