Accepted ruby-algebrick 0.7.4-2 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2022 00:34:28 +0100
Source: ruby-algebrick
Architecture: source
Version: 0.7.4-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Ruby Team <pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@debian.org>
Changes:
ruby-algebrick (0.7.4-2) unstable; urgency=medium
.
[ Utkarsh Gupta ]
* Add salsa-ci.yml
.
[ Debian Janitor ]
* Use secure copyright file specification URI.
* Use secure URI in debian/watch.
* Bump debhelper from deprecated 9 to 12.
* Set debhelper-compat version in Build-Depends.
* Set upstream metadata fields: Bug-Database, Bug-Submit, Repository,
Repository-Browse.
* Update Vcs-* headers from URL redirect.
* Use canonical URL in Vcs-Git.
* Update watch file format version to 4.
Checksums-Sha1:
df88b8bd5ddc91593e70c7f01b65779023d39f21 2034 ruby-algebrick_0.7.4-2.dsc
db0be92f936cda5973d02798393f256db2111e47 2008 ruby-algebrick_0.7.4-2.debian.tar.xz
5c3aeaf72536a2ac4bd88c3530edbd6b18f9f269 9238 ruby-algebrick_0.7.4-2_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
3832e5986323334e772d2cda532b2d8c1663037df025a1aef04959f903fa86f6 2034 ruby-algebrick_0.7.4-2.dsc
b736e3e79b4b993e12dc4bf46bac3def4a9d3802798e2729b9aaef3f11bd2192 2008 ruby-algebrick_0.7.4-2.debian.tar.xz
4f7ec544351d30d376ea56533967ac6d1e09929e10d6d0948c66648c11f111e2 9238 ruby-algebrick_0.7.4-2_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
e904ce3f0c086ee3f82ce21b3fc21f65 2034 ruby optional ruby-algebrick_0.7.4-2.dsc
d9eab823baf638f36bef951bb31663ba 2008 ruby optional ruby-algebrick_0.7.4-2.debian.tar.xz
56d17a03e701ff30f2452c9771a21935 9238 ruby optional ruby-algebrick_0.7.4-2_amd64.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=f5IK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: