[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted binutils 2.38-4 (source) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 02 May 2022 22:50:25 +0200
Source: binutils
Architecture: source
Version: 2.38-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>
Changed-By: Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>
Closes: 1010238
Changes:
 binutils (2.38-4) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Update from the binutils 2.38 branch:
     - Fix PR ld/29087, x86: invalid relocation against protected symbol.
     - s390: Add DT_JMPREL pointing to .rela.[i]plt with static-pie.
     - Fix PR ld/22263, s390: Avoid dynamic TLS relocs in PIE.
     - Fix PR libctf/28933: ld: diagnose corrupted CTF header cth_strlen.
     - Fix PR 28885.
     - PR28959, obdump doesn't disassemble mftb instruction.
     - PowerPC64 DT_RELR relative reloc addresses.
   * Fix reproducible builds: source tarball embeds build user and group.
     Closes: #1010238.
Checksums-Sha1:
 1547820e2976cfbea98b4ca582ec7708be7ad323 11276 binutils_2.38-4.dsc
 21afc015d2f1130ebf5f8e24ec488595da4f9233 273624 binutils_2.38-4.debian.tar.xz
 676e1ebe5e028d7d43aad98b66b996a0bd257292 6392 binutils_2.38-4_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 b87e5c78f73473ca6d28dd3ceec500179bb7f493cafcc8f9fbaf360c048c0aa5 11276 binutils_2.38-4.dsc
 f331fceb16096d611c6f3ad2235476bf845727c65fdbf6a89693e3c68404fbb1 273624 binutils_2.38-4.debian.tar.xz
 63704d55519f66530e76340f749988fe1e1f44ed167dcf625bf3b425a75a3091 6392 binutils_2.38-4_source.buildinfo
Files:
 edcc1282865f4800b439368f0d2aa5d1 11276 devel optional binutils_2.38-4.dsc
 286b82aacbbe3ae81a1ee9d960f9cc22 273624 devel optional binutils_2.38-4.debian.tar.xz
 28e642e0b15309c4203ea9627ce170bb 6392 devel optional binutils_2.38-4_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=a2gl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: