Accepted node-route-recognizer 0.3.4+git.20200411.3de84ec-5 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 01 May 2022 13:54:53 +0200
Source: node-route-recognizer
Architecture: source
Version: 0.3.4+git.20200411.3de84ec-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers <pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Yadd <yadd@debian.org>
Closes: 979786
Changes:
node-route-recognizer (0.3.4+git.20200411.3de84ec-5) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Team upload
.
[ lintian-overrides ]
* Trim trailing whitespace
* Set upstream metadata fields: Bug-Submit
* Remove obsolete fields Contact, Name from debian/upstream/metadata
(already present in machine-readable debian/copyright)
* Update standards version to 4.6.0, no changes needed
.
[ Yadd ]
* Add "Rules-Requires-Root: no"
* Fix filenamemangle
* Fix GitHub tags regex
* Use dh-sequence-nodejs instead of pkg-js-tools
* Drop nodejs dependency
* Fix debian/watch
* Drop dependency to deprecated node-typescript-types (Closes: #979786)
* Apply multi-arch hints (foreign)
Checksums-Sha1:
4374ca9644c60e6dc1f955091f89f1a32fb97443 2787 node-route-recognizer_0.3.4+git.20200411.3de84ec-5.dsc
8cd06e345b96a5a93a76ca242c92595a6ff3730c 3244 node-route-recognizer_0.3.4+git.20200411.3de84ec-5.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
fafb8d184387f4933361a6a5e1bad06f44bc408b54af22a24b9296ac90dbbf21 2787 node-route-recognizer_0.3.4+git.20200411.3de84ec-5.dsc
6272e4ebb134a04e077e487e26935a8444a0918ff6ee136c54931e828f5c8814 3244 node-route-recognizer_0.3.4+git.20200411.3de84ec-5.debian.tar.xz
Files:
103431cec74ec9e21b08581d3412a249 2787 javascript optional node-route-recognizer_0.3.4+git.20200411.3de84ec-5.dsc
9f21b7e70aa224320c23740a822bfc07 3244 javascript optional node-route-recognizer_0.3.4+git.20200411.3de84ec-5.debian.tar.xz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=pNCm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: