[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted dconf 0.40.0-3 (source) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2022 16:09:53 -0500
Source: dconf
Built-For-Profiles: noudeb
Architecture: source
Version: 0.40.0-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian GNOME Maintainers <pkg-gnome-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Jeremy Bicha <jeremy.bicha@canonical.com>
Changes:
 dconf (0.40.0-3) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   [ Debian Janitor ]
   * Remove 1 obsolete maintscript entry
   * Bump debhelper from old 12 to 13. + debian/rules:
     - Drop --fail-missing argument to dh_missing, which is now the default
   * Add upstream metadata file
   * Update standards version to 4.6.0, no changes needed
   * Avoid explicitly specifying -Wl,--as-needed linker flag
 .
   [ Jeremy Bicha ]
   * Build-Depend on dh-sequence-gnome instead of gnome-pkg-tools
   * Update debian/watch & debian/gbp.conf for team style
   * debian/rules: Don't ignore test failures but increase the timeout
     multiplier
Checksums-Sha1:
 a65bbd0edab3e301fe0b5c1b4cac9f1449f0a627 2630 dconf_0.40.0-3.dsc
 d7cbb905ef8613b319376a8ccb42c7c424926244 11056 dconf_0.40.0-3.debian.tar.xz
 ecc4ea0d39a82f4612beb7a271e1205e2683535a 8093 dconf_0.40.0-3_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 2fa067a52258cf30fd602fafcaec51790539ecff583eb00f0f18569971dbe494 2630 dconf_0.40.0-3.dsc
 4c32ddffdef332282cf69669551c157d4e01487100cd2e9e354f4bc204d9ccd6 11056 dconf_0.40.0-3.debian.tar.xz
 aceac4ce0a22fb03ece6226d3afbaf3d8cb74253d850e907f54db8d406476f76 8093 dconf_0.40.0-3_source.buildinfo
Files:
 c03c73762e8b3eb6699aac67d07b8a5e 2630 libs optional dconf_0.40.0-3.dsc
 22dfeb52d8b9893467bce69b4cb7f46f 11056 libs optional dconf_0.40.0-3.debian.tar.xz
 8de08ed6171f59eb453fe6e730a7daf7 8093 libs optional dconf_0.40.0-3_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=QCyq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: