Accepted linux-signed-arm64 5.16.4+1~exp1 (source) into experimental
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2022 19:00:56 +0100
Source: linux-signed-arm64
Architecture: source
Version: 5.16.4+1~exp1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team <debian-kernel@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
Changes:
linux-signed-arm64 (5.16.4+1~exp1) experimental; urgency=medium
.
* Sign kernel from linux 5.16.4-1~exp1
.
* New upstream stable update:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/ChangeLog-5.16.4
- io_uring: fix not released cached task refs
- bnx2x: Utilize firmware 7.13.21.0
- bnx2x: Invalidate fastpath HSI version for VFs
- memcg: better bounds on the memcg stats updates
- rcu: Tighten rcu_advance_cbs_nowake() checks
- select: Fix indefinitely sleeping task in poll_schedule_timeout()
- [arm64] bpf: Remove 128MB limit for BPF JIT programs
.
* objtool: check: give big enough buffer for pv_ops (Closes: #1004495)
* Refresh "firmware: Remove redundant log messages from drivers"
* [rt] Refresh "mm/memcg: Protect per-CPU counter by disabling preemption on
PREEMPT_RT where needed."
Checksums-Sha1:
36dd8f0cb29b600610d4e5ee5894514bfde1e46a 7640 linux-signed-arm64_5.16.4+1~exp1.dsc
29132de036a5d33cbb3d283d2ff6ef4e785e6050 2529964 linux-signed-arm64_5.16.4+1~exp1.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
38b3ad15f0e09da5e0651d29f71fa55fb663c08f35b6f6da935df2dea86dce56 7640 linux-signed-arm64_5.16.4+1~exp1.dsc
fe0723c32293225493992d512852d0daec6fde2e9ccf44f82270f72de5cc59f4 2529964 linux-signed-arm64_5.16.4+1~exp1.tar.xz
Files:
495dfd6ec7d93ae4ded12bb953f861cf 7640 kernel optional linux-signed-arm64_5.16.4+1~exp1.dsc
0aa3e01eacbae62d6c0ddbab57162630 2529964 kernel optional linux-signed-arm64_5.16.4+1~exp1.tar.xz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=5Ro5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: