[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted sbt-launcher-interface 1.0.1-2 (source) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2021 14:27:59 +0100
Source: sbt-launcher-interface
Architecture: source
Version: 1.0.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers <pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Pierre Gruet <pgt@debian.org>
Closes: 980612
Changes:
 sbt-launcher-interface (1.0.1-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Team upload
   * Depending on dehelper-compat 13
   * Setting Standards version to 4.6.0:
     - Using https URI in d/copyright
     - Rules-Requires-Root: no
   * Using https URI for homepage in d/control
   * Patching Update.scala so that it builds against Ivy 2.5.0 (Closes: #980612)
   * Cleaning the d/patches directory
   * Set upstream metadata fields: Bug-Database, Bug-Submit, Repository,
     Repository-Browse.
Checksums-Sha1:
 5e6435b27de8512499f10a8c1efb9513bad10b3f 2136 sbt-launcher-interface_1.0.1-2.dsc
 0300de85f6b0f8abbb2e277c97aad1c03d48dd74 5200 sbt-launcher-interface_1.0.1-2.debian.tar.xz
 fad3fc0d6bfc85057b862239271646c8457edcf4 10995 sbt-launcher-interface_1.0.1-2_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 9b556a64a34814ff4bea68f0c564f4583ac60a63513e3ffb6213a1aaaea3fdc2 2136 sbt-launcher-interface_1.0.1-2.dsc
 e73cb337c1e53721616f15ed9b9a01a384db363403391ae9fecaa1aa511561f5 5200 sbt-launcher-interface_1.0.1-2.debian.tar.xz
 3faa44f8dca9e8c0e335e12eae8113c0c8db51f02ae0aecefc5bdee3fabe26bf 10995 sbt-launcher-interface_1.0.1-2_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 7efb70654c4fec863d11968e317d30bd 2136 java optional sbt-launcher-interface_1.0.1-2.dsc
 279492d9d3d6df6124b72cd5cdf121b8 5200 java optional sbt-launcher-interface_1.0.1-2.debian.tar.xz
 6ceba499da1a91a17b9ddb11a6082d30 10995 java optional sbt-launcher-interface_1.0.1-2_amd64.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=rKuX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: