[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted pasdoc 0.16.0-2 (source) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2021 11:28:55 +0100
Source: pasdoc
Architecture: source
Version: 0.16.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Pascal Packaging Team <pkg-pascal-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Abou Al Montacir <abou.almontacir@sfr.fr>
Changes:
 pasdoc (0.16.0-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   [ Debian Janitor ]
   * Set upstream metadata fields: Bug-Database, Bug-Submit.
     Changes-By: lintian-brush
     Fixes: lintian: upstream-metadata-missing-bug-tracking
     See-also: https://lintian.debian.org/tags/upstream-metadata-missing-bug-tracking.html
   * Update standards version to 4.5.1, no changes needed.
     Changes-By: lintian-brush
     Fixes: lintian: out-of-date-standards-version
     See-also: https://lintian.debian.org/tags/out-of-date-standards-version.html
Checksums-Sha1:
 7040edef2ac10507862f5e991e502e30efc22bc8 1438 pasdoc_0.16.0-2.dsc
 7845a06f4e8b72e2527f423384576d4f37c3550f 5916 pasdoc_0.16.0-2.debian.tar.xz
 1145a0eeb80167ec697f19831b00a224f165dd89 9265 pasdoc_0.16.0-2_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 b7202e76d5dfba3c94da03a62614a4da0a7263b13acf8fd455e6b08781f5a438 1438 pasdoc_0.16.0-2.dsc
 4891825054beb824b1a1320c3f2d864056f827788a5204fa7c7bd7291e869c04 5916 pasdoc_0.16.0-2.debian.tar.xz
 3b7204cfbbaff493e7f0b4e97db80a11cc3e2f558a8e940dd0cca7ecffd10d8a 9265 pasdoc_0.16.0-2_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 70f89fb554fd6734e8fcf8d1d6914ec9 1438 doc optional pasdoc_0.16.0-2.dsc
 84a5358e9b7be8b1b0eca67b7ea6bb74 5916 doc optional pasdoc_0.16.0-2.debian.tar.xz
 9fbc0b5a63430741ddba99e439517c55 9265 doc optional pasdoc_0.16.0-2_amd64.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iI0EAREKADUWIQS69sZENhB4UNQicQazJVxtVYeNjAUCYX/CBBccYWJvdS5hbG1v
bnRhY2lyQHNmci5mcgAKCRCzJVxtVYeNjAKiAQCM27HEOHatiOXgR3d9hZps8y/G
9aTPbV868Gejf1yLoAD/VppfgZ25cFVlEzgpwTjgDaHOcl3HxAUMybjpKv5XWRY=
=vqr2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: