[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted linux-signed-amd64 5.10.46+4 (source) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2021 07:50:50 +0200
Source: linux-signed-amd64
Architecture: source
Version: 5.10.46+4
Distribution: sid
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team <debian-kernel@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
Changes:
 linux-signed-amd64 (5.10.46+4) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Sign kernel from linux 5.10.46-4
 .
   * bpf: Introduce BPF nospec instruction for mitigating Spectre v4
     (CVE-2021-34556, CVE-2021-35477)
   * bpf: Fix leakage due to insufficient speculative store bypass mitigation
     (CVE-2021-34556, CVE-2021-35477)
   * bpf: Remove superfluous aux sanitation on subprog rejection
   * Ignore ABI changes for bpf_offload_dev_create and bpf_verifier_log_write
   * bpf: Add kconfig knob for disabling unpriv bpf by default
   * init: Enable BPF_UNPRIV_DEFAULT_OFF (Closes: #990411)
   * linux-image: Add NEWS entry documenting that unprivileged calls to bpf() are
     disabled by default in Debian.
   * bpf: verifier: Allocate idmap scratch in verifier env
   * bpf: Fix pointer arithmetic mask tightening under state pruning
Checksums-Sha1:
 39865276fccf6819e607b7176754d0ec277fe1f8 8487 linux-signed-amd64_5.10.46+4.dsc
 36e93ceca4160349ef0813db1c34c4d36520d3a5 2668800 linux-signed-amd64_5.10.46+4.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 a450323387a056847614b4bb1adaad736c127d40783df55c3a8733d7149671f9 8487 linux-signed-amd64_5.10.46+4.dsc
 e83af87167378fef06f53779b4bf7fe420560b92722915ca4eda3810237acc68 2668800 linux-signed-amd64_5.10.46+4.tar.xz
Files:
 4fa6d6d37b3e815d464e7420a3309ebf 8487 kernel optional linux-signed-amd64_5.10.46+4.dsc
 9983e393bf4a0ee422c5735cfab38e44 2668800 kernel optional linux-signed-amd64_5.10.46+4.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=L4N5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: