[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted pam 1.4.0-9 (source) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2021 10:55:02 -0600
Source: pam
Architecture: source
Version: 1.4.0-9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
Changed-By: Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org>
Changes:
 pam (1.4.0-9) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Revert prefer the multiarch path from 1.4.0-8: It turns out that
     Debian uses DEFAULT_MODULE_PATH and _PAM_ISA in the opposite meaning
     of upstream.  If I had read the patch header of
     patches-applied/lib_security_multiarch_compat more closely I would
     have noticed this.  The effect of 1.4.0-9 is what is stated in the
     1.4.0-8 changelog: we prefer multiarch paths, but the original patch
     did that.
   * I did test this in 1.4.0-8, but my test design was flawed.  I placed a
     invalid shared object in /lib/security and confirmed it did not shadow
     an object in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/security.  However I realized
     shortly after releasing 1.4.0-8 that a valid shared object in
     /lib/security will shadow one in the multiarch path.
Checksums-Sha1:
 530224625f0e7a7d26ebfee464b369d8e120f50f 1909 pam_1.4.0-9.dsc
 3c483729908432dda5b69769bb12dfaa9e86351e 120168 pam_1.4.0-9.debian.tar.xz
 82ad1d26febd30bc92ca516154ceea96caaed2b0 4976 pam_1.4.0-9_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 61b50132e7e1eb8d447884c86cbfaa386ddca28f44e181f5fe6706a2880c7bbd 1909 pam_1.4.0-9.dsc
 bc05be20526cd4c84cda4818d16f2045fa62bff8a6148fc790f6e828b448fee8 120168 pam_1.4.0-9.debian.tar.xz
 1f84b5180eab235d5fb925b68b22399467d859d1fda33a52dc539b9277b80c0d 4976 pam_1.4.0-9_source.buildinfo
Files:
 a2570186acc21c5c58dbf83731403a21 1909 libs optional pam_1.4.0-9.dsc
 787faf706e9bf359409d423503d29976 120168 libs optional pam_1.4.0-9.debian.tar.xz
 0bee2f2e9f930a1e472b78f22ee1fd0c 4976 libs optional pam_1.4.0-9_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEARYIAB0WIQSj2jRwbAdKzGY/4uAsbEw8qDeGdAUCYOiD6QAKCRAsbEw8qDeG
dEQTAP0RjcarELMpIntaINg34J7OTfhoX+0wOmp8uOsX1tSu8AEA/AnMYxMwyQ0Y
Bfc1Tj1FkI3mUH+PJEMlxjByzV1ZHgc=
=58ZJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: