Accepted ensmallen 2.16.1-1 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2021 20:38:57 +0000
Source: ensmallen
Architecture: source
Version: 2.16.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers <debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net>
Changed-By: Barak A. Pearlmutter <bap@debian.org>
Closes: 983169 983941
Changes:
ensmallen (2.16.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* New upstream version, may fix broken test (closes: #983169, #983941)
* Bump policy
* Remove multi-arch: same
conflicts on /usr/lib/cmake/ensmallen/ensmallen-config-version.cmake on amd64, mips64el <-> i386, mipsel
(alternative solution would be to put the file in
/usr/lib/$(DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH)/cmake/... but that hardly seems worthwhile.)
Checksums-Sha1:
4f6e3160aa38b0d36f858883121cd37e03c90376 2031 ensmallen_2.16.1-1.dsc
aa11773ff1bcf8fba4d00cd48a36345326c0d341 1044700 ensmallen_2.16.1.orig.tar.xz
d6816f54e57478cddd4708ad1f6b402c73d45bad 5004 ensmallen_2.16.1-1.debian.tar.xz
f86031be4d55596ade7d7bff0665536537a057cd 7814 ensmallen_2.16.1-1_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
ebd885a62721093455e3c6f6441260eb1fc4fa35772caad9d8742f8548317e72 2031 ensmallen_2.16.1-1.dsc
14494008ce3cbda47fc38daa790c48514c2f02779d9f61da33013584c8a198c4 1044700 ensmallen_2.16.1.orig.tar.xz
cfe94144686d42a2292606051994f4fdaed1e2e4a0f914280673890021cc989b 5004 ensmallen_2.16.1-1.debian.tar.xz
3dfc167fb699abff208a63351db33430802b6f2498747f6d5c35c80b664741cb 7814 ensmallen_2.16.1-1_source.buildinfo
Files:
1a901bb4b234b58ce46fdac6fb8e157c 2031 libs optional ensmallen_2.16.1-1.dsc
c8cb9b95b2a198f2400273455497d8b0 1044700 libs optional ensmallen_2.16.1.orig.tar.xz
504d775eb1deff92c900b4d4e8595e91 5004 libs optional ensmallen_2.16.1-1.debian.tar.xz
6c4747092496ca93b2c82b9158e2759e 7814 libs optional ensmallen_2.16.1-1_source.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=jK8w
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: