Accepted activemq 5.16.1-1 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2021 17:08:31 +0100
Source: activemq
Architecture: source
Version: 5.16.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers <pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org>
Closes: 982590
Changes:
activemq (5.16.1-1) unstable; urgency=high
.
* Team upload.
* New upstream version 5.16.1.
- Fix CVE-2021-26117: no check on LDAP user password (Closes: #982590)
Thanks to Salvatore Bonaccorso for the report.
* Declare compliance with Debian Policy 4.5.1.
Checksums-Sha1:
fdcceb864663638bc942b2d191662fe61bdfb558 3592 activemq_5.16.1-1.dsc
0c721998a736d026fbb0fbb1541682c1a91033d6 2789828 activemq_5.16.1.orig.tar.xz
263352cd6a81220d1f8b5eb2bf5809e1c81db19b 16660 activemq_5.16.1-1.debian.tar.xz
8556a10108f0559469672489320b5368f3fae850 16066 activemq_5.16.1-1_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
9bd92c3d1c90f0b3bf1430d2d05c6f0b561552ad32ec8e9d9ab8a735f10a864c 3592 activemq_5.16.1-1.dsc
9d4adaf8cc0b96389ca3beae5e49479d44a0e9cd5e021b261f07578277ccefce 2789828 activemq_5.16.1.orig.tar.xz
b829ffbc6f61e7a5f065f91be02713dc791efc2efffa94a050ed3c486f0d0191 16660 activemq_5.16.1-1.debian.tar.xz
18ea434c4476d4a32097dd516d6a7f6744e1d57e27b7ac52e8c4c9ed3e83a34c 16066 activemq_5.16.1-1_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
124d658b063da2b9d6a52b5f800a2fd1 3592 java optional activemq_5.16.1-1.dsc
52d84aeae891e3f540b87cd3776b0aab 2789828 java optional activemq_5.16.1.orig.tar.xz
6ab3af5f60ffc920cec4cc316c8b90bf 16660 java optional activemq_5.16.1-1.debian.tar.xz
9f8519257b3e47aa86c4a713b9a49b30 16066 java optional activemq_5.16.1-1_amd64.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=tEg9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: