Accepted gcc-snapshot 1:20210101-1 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2021 11:22:12 +0100
Source: gcc-snapshot
Architecture: source
Version: 1:20210101-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian GCC Maintainers <debian-gcc@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>
Changes:
gcc-snapshot (1:20210101-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Snapshot, taken from the trunk (20210101).
* Don't build jit on m68k.
* Force running the tests on some port architectures. It's an insane
decision not to run tests for the whole port as a default.
* Disable go on ia64, s390x, broken after the libgo 1.16 merge.
Checksums-Sha1:
f54adf6f10bb7dd0fe0b15fde28f5fcae2aa8903 12814 gcc-snapshot_20210101-1.dsc
d0d8090f7edc850bf318e73ed82dc4a2b0815c41 93709812 gcc-snapshot_20210101.orig.tar.gz
a4f8bfebf2fa8abda0ae7e5a920ce2c9a3bb9aa4 483728 gcc-snapshot_20210101-1.debian.tar.xz
e8159f6986a72ee05995969ee6403676773c2c77 9368 gcc-snapshot_20210101-1_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
b59a6f9a39b57747c0a72e6e51472b81bc97c317a904ac7bbaf209bdca731efa 12814 gcc-snapshot_20210101-1.dsc
cd1d3c97f6bb1890f290312e6c83583f27a23c5aea3a4835ea28f2d8f31478ec 93709812 gcc-snapshot_20210101.orig.tar.gz
98e7d1aacafc7e332e084e9759796525e70879fdbfc52319889c09f6ea43997c 483728 gcc-snapshot_20210101-1.debian.tar.xz
b50d3ace89e88e6c2745b0027a152232ed237c354309593b9779bf381dba8740 9368 gcc-snapshot_20210101-1_source.buildinfo
Files:
32cf2f24b77e465ab5420be8a5bf0a5e 12814 devel optional gcc-snapshot_20210101-1.dsc
e716838c060034836076c330028ad25a 93709812 devel optional gcc-snapshot_20210101.orig.tar.gz
c205fbc5a63a8cada0f3cdc95ee68ea2 483728 devel optional gcc-snapshot_20210101-1.debian.tar.xz
865259e27aef9ce0ea04708138d3464c 9368 devel optional gcc-snapshot_20210101-1_source.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=t5j6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: