Accepted librdp-taxonomy-tree-java 1.2.0-4 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2020 20:22:10 +0100
Source: librdp-taxonomy-tree-java
Architecture: source
Version: 1.2.0-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Med Packaging Team <debian-med-packaging@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org>
Changes:
librdp-taxonomy-tree-java (1.2.0-4) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Standards-Version: 4.5.1 (routine-update)
* debhelper-compat 13 (routine-update)
* Add salsa-ci file (routine-update)
* Rules-Requires-Root: no (routine-update)
* Set upstream metadata fields: Bug-Database, Bug-Submit, Repository,
Repository-Browse.
* watch file standard 4 (routine-update)
Checksums-Sha1:
2ef21758755898b7b7c3b8f3192811af70ca8681 2178 librdp-taxonomy-tree-java_1.2.0-4.dsc
b6c063a94a45f2cc520614c1a8dd4d74916ca557 1808 librdp-taxonomy-tree-java_1.2.0-4.debian.tar.xz
c7b7f5176ccc5ba3fdaa1fcd66580759f8eca589 10688 librdp-taxonomy-tree-java_1.2.0-4_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
95130ea0c5c335324d71d81b37c1dc464d62f5f16f787f590df882c701d8f8fc 2178 librdp-taxonomy-tree-java_1.2.0-4.dsc
10cb06d98b4b85c7b31afb559d34edf7ec1194bad60cecea1948b2b495ffac58 1808 librdp-taxonomy-tree-java_1.2.0-4.debian.tar.xz
57c29c7a659128a3ae06628488921096b976360809cb668d7f6901a82b058145 10688 librdp-taxonomy-tree-java_1.2.0-4_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
a73ff53049a16292e72a0bb4e1a4b84c 2178 java optional librdp-taxonomy-tree-java_1.2.0-4.dsc
6668e9eeedf98851abdeaba26216fa10 1808 java optional librdp-taxonomy-tree-java_1.2.0-4.debian.tar.xz
2db7c0d2ca284a0b0b0cdc18684089e0 10688 java optional librdp-taxonomy-tree-java_1.2.0-4_amd64.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQJFBAEBCAAvFiEE8fAHMgoDVUHwpmPKV4oElNHGRtEFAl/H6gcRHHRpbGxlQGRl
Ymlhbi5vcmcACgkQV4oElNHGRtFjzg/9GMxKdh+2+3cikK/MzD5O6cFQyccR4F1Z
wSgXeCxsXlmPhK2OMZxJOZkKDUHjUZDGDVA68DgUau8s/1A6ASIZwCK/CpmLV+pg
RmnZQ2dBmKyQxHDC1dI7Kc/rF/JAZfv8Yhu7qHuuXAhe/Bt/VBT8F6SRJwCJdnC+
UzdjNiQJbOl4ogOAETnJraG84/jU3EQGjLWzpDgnNmN/67kE5OwqJL8pEG5aiFbI
nas6kch31Mb9Z2SsV4jtxdco5BOIO5egnT4CGNFT25BJb5T4F4O7U8+b+ORD97TU
WedZyIbYVHVML5BNfM/zIe4UjtRao38HuRarjy8rTWXqt3Ge8u4ZxSgdCn3YIH8o
YWu/449PUdLYt8zht29d+Lfn5FiXLsVQ4PIggiCio8uhXnwI8yoMLsNATNGIilfQ
ThT2kiM/oBwfqgngTSfpKX7BhMNd1LQ2dqP9QyrFbdd9j7gpwE6Hpy7ddltDp7OI
yd8tCViF+0SIwtEg0OBpRWMm3xhy62tKcV062XkkW36N4VdNz9bco2NkMhhmpOU8
YJuM6aDzmiPLWaHDpJIABeJJgWgAczDxLHypI4EOcz3XSINf1CPqoTdn/IaKMPf/
6JXKbE0SMUrOX8quptW1BnmwgE0/9Eklp9ZiLfSgg3fMcc1kQU9SAjaCQK9psFte
vI88ZnIe/RE=
=sFgp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: