Accepted llvm-toolchain-9 1:9~+rc3-1~exp2 (source) into experimental
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2019 10:46:45 +0200
Source: llvm-toolchain-9
Architecture: source
Version: 1:9~+rc3-1~exp2
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: LLVM Packaging Team <pkg-llvm-team@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Sylvestre Ledru <sylvestre@debian.org>
Closes: 939172
Changes:
llvm-toolchain-9 (1:9~+rc3-1~exp2) experimental; urgency=medium
.
* Debian moved to gcc-9. This gcc version now refuses -flto="Thin"
Move from LLVM_ENABLE_LTO="Thin" to BOOTSTRAP_LLVM_ENABLE_LTO="Thin"
to mitigate the issue (the argument should be passed only at the
second stage of the build process)
See https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43193
* Fix a link issue (Closes: #939172)
Checksums-Sha1:
8dbaa019cecaca062547b52375f6f0d8f1cda238 8679 llvm-toolchain-9_9~+rc3-1~exp2.dsc
e35a4a16931d165916c0efca739cea52122b6b0e 108944 llvm-toolchain-9_9~+rc3-1~exp2.debian.tar.xz
9bf8a6f352fe8b008751ed959037478cf7e624d4 11382 llvm-toolchain-9_9~+rc3-1~exp2_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
4170fcb70fa20f6b1b4d175ab2872b63aeb50e89e2773fa691b21f32f9302b82 8679 llvm-toolchain-9_9~+rc3-1~exp2.dsc
cb337f8d92746dbf307e6b8c115f62723f94865d6a82c62a924c27f44b7b61b8 108944 llvm-toolchain-9_9~+rc3-1~exp2.debian.tar.xz
8c010978a40321baf56159c3238d44a9ef61362bc80308cc965992ee541bd114 11382 llvm-toolchain-9_9~+rc3-1~exp2_source.buildinfo
Files:
90c7eef754761e0d281040e8c1b7c4c6 8679 devel optional llvm-toolchain-9_9~+rc3-1~exp2.dsc
dcce9cdbd5587dadac70fcbffc274ab7 108944 devel optional llvm-toolchain-9_9~+rc3-1~exp2.debian.tar.xz
82c6942104196f16ea74abb4ed30745f 11382 devel optional llvm-toolchain-9_9~+rc3-1~exp2_source.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=WhJ4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: