Accepted lintian-brush 0.27 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2019 22:44:21 +0000
Source: lintian-brush
Architecture: source
Version: 0.27
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@debian.org>
Changed-By: Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@debian.org>
Closes: 939131
Changes:
lintian-brush (0.27) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Add fixer for package-contains-linda-overrides.
* Add fixer for excessive-priority-for-library-package.
* Add fixer for debian-rules-sets-dpkg-architecture-variable.
* Add fixers for missing-built-using-field-for-golang-package and
built-using-field-on-arch-all-package.
* Add fixer for debian-control-has-unusual-field-spacing.
* Support running in packages that are not at the repository root.
* Print an error message if a fixer could not be found. Closes:
#939131
* Update standards version, no changes needed.
* Set debhelper-compat version in Build-Depends.
* Don't create upstream metadata files for native packages.
Checksums-Sha1:
911bf54991757b8f36ba1655ff0a2bab66e2efa4 1922 lintian-brush_0.27.dsc
797633a224f674370d686a469f41363a44c82843 734416 lintian-brush_0.27.tar.xz
8bbfd8e0d9305d72a5a85657518a9b72a9702852 6986 lintian-brush_0.27_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
909aaa90dad7e2042915ad56faf78cd7b60c2e1c8edb310ab9fd1b41c5315090 1922 lintian-brush_0.27.dsc
99dc2e800d9290388ade3d613b1c1fd4bdb4d92772d3361a80b6c0de095d8984 734416 lintian-brush_0.27.tar.xz
a07ded0090355d3b4047f7745f4deae668b7a08043c4dc5c86be0151849418b9 6986 lintian-brush_0.27_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
6cea65bb674b965d34e0efded3bf25bf 1922 devel optional lintian-brush_0.27.dsc
ad6e9dba1da37741d3762c3db6b3c05a 734416 devel optional lintian-brush_0.27.tar.xz
d69a2e92b702367c23c078766e2e9fa9 6986 devel optional lintian-brush_0.27_amd64.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=JOel
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: