Accepted exim4 4.92-8 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 08 Jun 2019 17:37:43 +0200
Source: exim4
Architecture: source
Version: 4.92-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Exim4 Maintainers <pkg-exim4-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Andreas Metzler <ametzler@debian.org>
Changes:
exim4 (4.92-8) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Pulled from exim-4.92+fixes branch:
+ 75_11-GnuTLS-fix-tls_out_ocsp-under-hosts_request_ocsp.patch
Fix expansion of $tls_out_ocsp under hosts_request_ocsp.
+ 75_12-GnuTLS-fix-the-advertising-of-acceptable-certs-by-th.patch
When tls_verify_certificates was set to a directory instead of a file
exim/GnuTLS would still send out the list of accepted certificates,
This did not match documented behavior.
+ 75_13-Use-dsn_from-for-success-DSN-messages.-Bug-2404.patch
The dsn_from option was not used for DSN success messages.
* Pulled from upstream GIT master:
+ 75_14-Fix-smtp-response-timeout.patch
Fix the timeout on smtp response to apply to the whole response instead
of resetting for every byte received.
+ 75_15-Fix-detection-of-32b-platform-at-build-time.-Bug-240.patch
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2405
${eval } was broken on 32bit archs.
Checksums-Sha1:
0b1aaddb6dd85d9e8ac884b3cade174c714c54ed 2823 exim4_4.92-8.dsc
d00d69600aff43e6cc5589c8f6c8cabb88549702 469932 exim4_4.92-8.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
d165be98d359c52dfbad764dbc969c9cd463c7ad8903947a6e5760c0ddbd56e3 2823 exim4_4.92-8.dsc
7d652ce2eaefbd265685ae5fce754ed5834e3f1d03793db4c4722a8cad769744 469932 exim4_4.92-8.debian.tar.xz
Files:
c9139468d9c796e8b9d84dafa3df6d95 2823 mail standard exim4_4.92-8.dsc
c60320627f8816bac1482a093f3dbae9 469932 mail standard exim4_4.92-8.debian.tar.xz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=K5Qn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: