Accepted r-cran-labeling 0.3-3 (source all) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 31 May 2018 14:13:37 +0200
Source: r-cran-labeling
Binary: r-cran-labeling
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.3-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian R Packages Maintainers <r-pkg-team@alioth-lists.debian.net>
Changed-By: Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org>
Description:
r-cran-labeling - GNU R Axis Labeling optimization
Changes:
r-cran-labeling (0.3-3) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Rebuild for R 3.5 transition
* debhelper 11
* Maintainer: Debian R Packages Maintainers <r-pkg-team@alioth-
lists.debian.net>
* Point Vcs fields to salsa.debian.org
* dh-update-R to update Build-Depends
Checksums-Sha1:
989552c9d396b88beb5dadbe33db68e6f289b06f 2071 r-cran-labeling_0.3-3.dsc
ec457a8c2a2652f0e31450ed50e91f8a94e1d4f4 2292 r-cran-labeling_0.3-3.debian.tar.xz
e031f1dabbc2f031863f64bc4a4e1ab08fe3c626 61420 r-cran-labeling_0.3-3_all.deb
288a18b735a467a098380e1f18d9596ae2163dbb 9046 r-cran-labeling_0.3-3_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
d737779384e90011bf200a41f2296b4e4a4d7d6d3ca5f9426f51b6e6f254f0d1 2071 r-cran-labeling_0.3-3.dsc
1e1deae6cf499dce952cd071cb989d57f0694502d5dadc79a9c7315bd7289ed8 2292 r-cran-labeling_0.3-3.debian.tar.xz
afde8182ef5c81e60dd942cb7419b3ec8f8d37f0df288d2f9f696cb16da19703 61420 r-cran-labeling_0.3-3_all.deb
e098554ff3a2a810d880b3199dc7d200bd86412a27d4b3575eac33c5924f3376 9046 r-cran-labeling_0.3-3_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
2b5563018a7be2eb6f1cf3366c01de73 2071 gnu-r optional r-cran-labeling_0.3-3.dsc
89109acefef13017cb826cfb26af7e8f 2292 gnu-r optional r-cran-labeling_0.3-3.debian.tar.xz
e46acdcd4275e137a34704db2da30905 61420 gnu-r optional r-cran-labeling_0.3-3_all.deb
d4cba6bc2a04bd88f90c6e516e625900 9046 gnu-r optional r-cran-labeling_0.3-3_amd64.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=Gwz/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: