[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted abi-compliance-checker 1.99.22-1.1 (source) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2017 07:51:53 +0200
Source: abi-compliance-checker
Binary: abi-compliance-checker dh-acc
Architecture: source
Version: 1.99.22-1.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Ryan Niebur <ryanryan52@gmail.com>
Changed-By: Gianfranco Costamagna <locutusofborg@debian.org>
Description:
 abi-compliance-checker - tool to compare ABI compatibility of shared C/C++ library version
 dh-acc     - debhelper addon to compare ABI compatibility of shared C/C++ libr
Closes: 868473
Changes:
 abi-compliance-checker (1.99.22-1.1) unstable; urgency=high
 .
   [ Dmitry Shachnev ]
   * Add a patch to fix tests compilation with new GCC.
   * Add a patch to not rely on GCC for symbols mangling, it is not working
     with GCC 6 and GCC 7 because of PR c++/78040.
 .
   [ Gianfranco Costamagna ]
   * Non-maintainer upload
   * Fix autopkgtests, due to bad doit call (Closes: #868473)
Checksums-Sha1:
 09f41db3019c8566a991a1e2ae94b6308adbdda5 2190 abi-compliance-checker_1.99.22-1.1.dsc
 a3ed0426d538920d9bbb2459478b1a664592bb0d 8028 abi-compliance-checker_1.99.22-1.1.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 9a7f3e4f769e39af2cfe9d8fb5599763b32637af7b61cd8a3146a81489d5be0e 2190 abi-compliance-checker_1.99.22-1.1.dsc
 d1c589af75f965aa7657504b3ec17db64f23bb167e872ee811794669c3ec20c5 8028 abi-compliance-checker_1.99.22-1.1.debian.tar.xz
Files:
 d5c4c70833e989eaa65e9938b081f1e9 2190 devel optional abi-compliance-checker_1.99.22-1.1.dsc
 e5ad3ab23a362bad0e314c31232af911 8028 devel optional abi-compliance-checker_1.99.22-1.1.debian.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=gyy/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: